1864b Mould/Edit


Anonymous. Untitled. Gardeners’ Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette (23 Jan 1864), pp.81-2

(Article printed Jan 23)
This follow-up editorial shows that the editors are siding more with Matthew than von Liebig. They reproduce a letter from Liebig on a separate matter, which appears to rely on royal approval in order to prove a scientific point. The editors are quick to point out the fallacy here.

%d bloggers like this: